Pricing reflects the weight of the decisions I carry.
When technology and security choices carry commercial impact, leadership becomes a control in itself. I structure engagement around organizational complexity and the level of accountability required.
This is retained executive leadership. It is not consultancy.
The structural reality
Organisations often mistake the choice between a permanent hire and retained leadership as a cost decision.
It is a structural decision.
Permanent Hiring
Fixed cost. High friction. A permanent CISO or Head of IT introduces long-term commitment and recruitment timelines that often exceed six months. Decisions do not pause while you recruit. Once hired, you carry the full executive overhead regardless of whether that capacity is required.
Interim Hiring
Transitional authority. Interim models provide speed but operate within a fixed horizon. Authority is transitional by design. The mandate is locked to a duration, not adjusted to your changing exposure.
Retained Leadership
Calibrated authority. I provide leadership aligned to decision weight. This model introduces executive coverage without fixed employment or predefined exit dates.
| Model | Permanent Hire | Interim Hire | Fractional Hire |
|---|---|---|---|
| Commitment | Full-time employment contract | Fixed-term mandate | Retained executive authority calibrated to exposure |
| Cost Structure | Salary, benefits, equity, long-term overhead | Day rate, time-bound engagement | Retainer aligned to decision coverage |
| Recruitment Time | Often 3-6+ months | Rapid placement | Typically activated within weeks |
| Flexibility | Limited once hired | Ends at mandate completion | Scales with organisational complexity |
| Authority | Full organisational scope | Transitional stabilisation | Defined mandate aligned to material decisions |
| Capital Efficiency | Fixed executive overhead | Short-term expense | Proportionate leadership coverage without permanent cost |
Permanent Hire
- Commitment: Full-time employment contract
- Cost Structure: Salary, benefits, equity, long-term overhead
- Recruitment Time: Often 3-6+ months
- Flexibility: Limited once hired
- Authority: Full organisational scope
- Capital Efficiency: Fixed executive overhead
Interim Hire
- Commitment: Fixed-term mandate
- Cost Structure: Day rate, time-bound engagement
- Recruitment Time: Rapid placement
- Flexibility: Ends at mandate completion
- Authority: Transitional stabilisation
- Capital Efficiency: Short-term expense
Fractional Hire
- Commitment: Retained executive authority calibrated to exposure
- Cost Structure: Retainer aligned to decision coverage
- Recruitment Time: Typically activated within weeks
- Flexibility: Scales with organisational complexity
- Authority: Defined mandate aligned to material decisions
- Capital Efficiency: Proportionate leadership coverage without permanent cost
Capital efficiency is the priority.
Permanent hiring commits capital before exposure is fully defined. Interim engagement compresses authority into an arbitrary window.
I provide a model that expands and contracts with actual demand.
For scaling businesses, this preserves capital. For established firms, it removes structural duplication.
Pricing calibration
Pricing is not a standard day rate. It is calibrated against the material risk I manage for you.
What level of executive ownership is required for the decisions currently being carried?
Where permanent headcount is premature and advisory support is insufficient, I introduce the authority required to operate with control.
Pricing reflects that level of ownership.
Engagement begins with clarity
Before pricing is discussed, exposure must be understood. Without a diagnostic view of your environment, pricing is just guesswork.
An initial executive conversation establishes the reality of your situation:
-
Authority: Where decision power actually sits versus where it is assumed.
-
Risk: Which risks are deliberate choices and which are simply unmanaged.
-
Capacity: Whether your current leadership can actually handle your organizational complexity.
I do not sell commodity services. Pricing is calibrated strictly against the decision weight and material risk I am hired to own.
I operate as an embedded part of your leadership team. Whether the model is fractional, interim, or sustained, the focus remains on clear ownership and moving decisions forward.
You are paying for executive judgement and the removal of technical and security bottlenecks. You are not paying for hours or "activity volume."
As your complexity increases, I scale my involvement to maintain control. As ownership and delivery stabilise, I reduce my presence.
Frequently Asked Questions
No. Commitment is measured by ownership, not by the nature of the contract. I take executive responsibility for your outcomes. My reputation relies on execution, not just presence.
Typically within weeks. Unlike permanent recruitment, which can stall for months, I am designed for rapid intervention. We start with a focused conversation and move straight to execution.
Yes. Early-stage businesses face the highest "technical debt" risk. I establish discipline from day one so you don't have to retrofit governance or security once you've already scaled.
I don't disrupt. I clarify. Friction usually comes from a lack of direction or unclear ownership. I step in to remove that ambiguity, which typically increases team performance and morale.
Pricing is calibrated against your decision weight and complexity. It is significantly more capital-efficient than a permanent executive hire, as you aren't paying for unutilised capacity or long-term overhead.
Yes. You avoid recruitment fees, benefits, equity, and the "cost of carry" for a full-time executive when you only need fractional or interim authority. You pay for the leadership required, nothing more.
The Next Step
If you require senior leadership without committing to the friction of a permanent hire, we start with a focused discussion.
I don't provide a pitch. I provide a path to accountability.
Stop Owning IT. Start Leading Growth.
30 Years in the Trenches • Zero Learning Curve.
You've outgrown your current IT structure, but a £200k full-time hire isn't the answer yet. I provide the Senior Hand to manage your risk, road map, and technical debt so you can focus on scale.
