Here’s an embarrassing admission: I’m a lifelong Jets fan. If you need proof that the organization is considered a laughingstock, a 2019 article in Inc. magazine is titled, “Want to Be a Great Leader? Look to the New York Jets—and Then Do the Opposite.”
You seem to be interested in what's here, but haven't registered for an account yet or perhaps haven't logged in.
When you create an account, we will be able to remember what you've already read, so you can pick up exactly where you left off when you come back.
Oh, and it'll also get rid of this really annoying box.....
Cyber leaders say penetration testing is not full proof
Cerberus last edited by
In a new study that surveyed enterprises with 3,000 or more employees, 60% of respondents are concerned pentesting gives them limited coverage or leaves them with too many blind spots.
@cerberus This assumption would be correct in my view. The issue here is one of actual scope, plus the extent of the testing itself. The only true way to know how vulnerable assets are is to perform a vulnerability assessment inside your network. Detecting vulnerabilities at the perimeter level is one thing, but if this "wall" was ever breached, and exposed your internal network, then the scope dramatically increases dependant on the security of that internal network.
In reality, no "testing" is fool-proof. Much of this depends on your attitude to risk.